Rajeev Ram vs Benjamin Becker Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W L L L L
Form
L W L L L W L L W LHead To Head: Ram 1 - 1 Becker
They have played 6 sets in total, with Ram winning 3 and Becker winning 3. The last match between Ram and Becker was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 19-02-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Rajeev Ram getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rajeev Ram | 1 |
| Benjamin Becker | 1 |
| Ram | Stats | Becker |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 35 |
| 41 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 14 |
| 52% (427-388) | Career Total W/L | 57% (441-338) |
| $956,891 | Career Prize Money | $1,991,400 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Rajeev Ram
Player
Benjamin Becker
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 27 | Games Won | 28 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:2:45 | Average Match Time | 1:2:45 |
| 67% (63/94) | 1st Serve % | 56% (55/98) |
| 68% (43/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (34/55) |
| 48% (15/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 29% (4/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 41% (40/98) | Return Points Win % | 38% (36/94) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rajeev Ram vs Benjamin Becker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ram 1 - 1 Becker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ram has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Becker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ram, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Becker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ram has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Becker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ram has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Becker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ram has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 90/ 74), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 13/ 23). Becker has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 67/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 19/ 47).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ram winning 1 times and Becker being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Ram winning 3 and Becker winning 3. The last match between Ram and Becker was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 19-02-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Rajeev Ram getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ram and Becker have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ram winning 1 times and Becker 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ram winning 0, and Becker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ram has played against opponents with an average rank of while Becker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ram has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Becker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ram has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Becker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Rajeev Ram Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Attila Balazs
Player
Rajeev Ram
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Rajeev Ram
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Rajeev Ram
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Rajeev Ram
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Reilly Opelka
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
8
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Rajeev Ram
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
21 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Rajeev Ram
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Mirza Basic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Stefan Kozlov
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Becker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Benjamin Becker
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
115)
11
Aces
15
6
Double Faults
6
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Benjamin Becker
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Benjamin Becker
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
15
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Jonathan Gray
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
79%
(
58 of
73)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Benjamin Becker
70%
(
86 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
80 of
116)
9
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
80)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
39 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(10) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Benjamin Becker
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximo Gonzalez
Player
Benjamin Becker
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Guido Andreozzi
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Benjamin Becker
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ram vs Becker?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ram Vs Becker is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (427/388) | Win/Loss | 57% (441/338) |
| 52% (1009/932) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1007/862) |
| 50% (9694/9521) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9360/8852) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.51 |
| 3216 | Aces Total | 4534 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1000 | Total Double Faults | 1778 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 604.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 576.75 |
| 63% (20063/32097) | 1st Serve % | 57% (25139/44056) |
| 74% (14814/20063) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (18914/25139) |
| 50% (6061/12040) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (9545/18917) |
| 37% (942/2580) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1449/3653) |
| 35% (11434/32352) | Return Points Win % | 36% (16134/44826) |
| 54% (417/779) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (410/708) |
| 27% (7/26) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (23/63) |
| 52% (200/381) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (148/310) |
| 50% (140/278) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (133/230) |
| 82% (423/346) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (421/366) |
| 18% (423/75) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (421/55) |
| 20% (392/79) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (357/73) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
